Is Invisible Druid Overpowered?

[Phades]

How does an agl 3 unit ability stop a agl 4 card from acting?

Song Sorceress. You have a 50/50 chance of acting first.

Or it being flesh recycled...

[EvilGenius]

Or it being flesh recycled...

This was a Falkow solution, unless he plans to splash Lawtia for FR.

[Phades]

I meant the lawita player flesh recycling the song sorceror to allow the druid to act. That card is going to be a priority to remove anyhow considering how it enables several units to act first. Even so, if someone is 2 deep into lawita, it isn't unthinkable that flesh recycle would be included or soul bind for various reasons.

[EvilGenius]

I meant the lawita player flesh recycling the song sorceror to allow the druid to act. That card is going to be a priority to remove anyhow considering how it enables several units to act first. Even so, if someone is 2 deep into lawita, it isn't unthinkable that flesh recycle would be included or soul bind for various reasons.

True, but Song Sorceress would be back next turn. So they need a FR for each SS.

[Phades]

They would for a permenant stop to it, but the druid got to act that round due to song sorceress being out of commission. That style of play is similar to using soul bind, except that it forced the opponent to revive the character.

[EvilGenius]

They would for a permenant stop to it, but the druid got to act that round due to song sorceress being out of commission. That style of play is similar to using soul bind, except that it forced the opponent to revive the character.

Then it's 50 damage for 2 SP, which is about right. Definitely not overpowered.

[hexagram]

Just buffed in recent errata- wonder if any iczers in this thread still play

[GonFreeces31]

Doesn't move your souls. Card sucks.

[Urizen_forum]

It is not as bad as people think, wasn't before the errata either, it is a good addition to a more starterish version of lawt rush, it is just overshadowed by other techs like summer(not really tech), embrace, corruption, heartbroken, mad priest, etc.

[imortal12233]

people seem to be ignoring the fact that this thread was originally written in set 1/2 (not sure what date corresponds to what set)...