Icyglare wrote:When we first made mikasha, we are actually thinking about nerfing her a little before release. The fact that she can pump out so much damage at the start and Falkow has the most amount of grims that doesn't leave you at a SP disadvantage. But we're glad that we didn't and decided to indirectly buff her (having more cards that deal with cemetery retrieval). She didn't get a buff but we'll monitor card use to see if it warrants an errata in the future but at this time we don't plan on one for her.
Romdeau wrote:Well then, what would you like to discuss? I will answer what I can to the best of my abilities.
Romdeau wrote:Few weeks? You know that's not realstic. At some point in the future? Very possible.
angelspawns wrote:Why isn't that realistic? Even when it's something as simple as switching Orthos action with start? (as i'm sure you guys forgot to. Better would be make his cem removal into a first startskill...)
So when you **** up and make something close to unworkable, you can't undo the changes untill months later? Wow... You must be really good at this.
Shirozaki wrote:angelspawns wrote: I know Rom comes to chat to talk, but he hides behind 'not my idea' and 'then don't play it' for most part.
Something I observed on the former and current balance team was that no errata or balancing decision was anyone's idea unless you praised it, which magically made everyone try to claim the position of sole contributor.
That said I agree with the purpose of the thread, even if it is just to break the awkward silence that was supposedly to-be erased the moment Logress became Alteil's Evil Overlord.
GonFreeces31 wrote:First off I just want to clarify: I am not trolling here or being sarcastic or a douch in any way. Decisions were made and the errata buffed a lot of cards. There has been a lot of negative feedback to these changes, that the balance team remains mute about. I'm wondering if it is possible to get some conversation going where the people in charge publicly address concerns people have, and describe what the decision making process was like, or what the reasoning behind the buffs was. This is very common in other games such as LoL where the employees are very vocal and interactive about game improvements.
What do you guys think?
Romdeau wrote:I think the ball was kinda dropped on Folfenac, his mark ability should only drain spheres if it activates on a living unit with more than 0HP.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 2 guests