Peralisc9001 wrote:Even if you have accessibility, you still don't want to be restricted to cards XYZ because only those counter cards UVW.
angelspawns wrote:I understand your point of view.
What happens if a player plays both sides, and then whine about crap that's OP? Because i stepped away from Refess to prove a point about Falkow.
Build myself a Diondora file: 27 winstreak on first try. I was surprised and shocked how easy it went compared to my Refess background.
Build myself an Urgant file: 2000RP. Didn't even use the metaversion. I set my target to 2000RP, got there, and abandon it.
I hate both decks and only took them as far as my patience allowed me. If i was anything of a Spike or grinder i'm sure i could take those numbers higher. Unfortunatly i need variation and creativity fluids flowing to keep me motivated playing.
One thing for me was certain: After a long time playing Refess, Falkow felt like childsplay. Having access to immediate solutions (Grims) makes this game 10x easier. There is far less "predicting your opponent" involved and more immediate solutions at your disposal. With Refess you deal with a threat with your field.
When a threat comes you can't just simply 'wish' it away. Field units in order to counterplay your opponents threats requires far more predicting, time openskills with FireArrows/Sakura/DmgSS's/SinSS's, evaluate next turns in order to press standby (and save SP reviving) or do that additional 25dmg. Agi rolls and random hits. And above all: keep SP flowing to keep together multiple units & field more, dispite taking heavy blows on your line of defence and openskills on your support.
After all this evaluating i decided Refess needed more (counterplay) options to respond to threats and strategies faster & better. I decided the power of returns needed to be toned down to create a more even playground. Wether it is with better counters or nerfs, the difference between a rush w. and w/o returns is to damn high and unbalanced.
So there you go. Valuable input of somebody seeing both sides.
Kittuns wrote:We've had limited tourneys before--the better players made the best metas they could there too, and the best players still won. I came in third in the first limited tourney and fourth in another in the male/female split tourney.
oh hey you hit 2200 RP. Well, that's not because you're a good player, but because you're using IMBA
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest