AquasFire3 wrote:if havent faced 30/30 phionex chick you have nothing to complain about lol
AqvasFire2 wrote:Stop relying on the one-card mentality? Try playing big red vs. mid ref. My guess is that you will die horribly.
GonFreeces31 wrote:AqvasFire2 wrote:Then what about the fact that Phoenix chick more or less autowins vs big red or anyone else that depends on huge damage from one unit?
"Because X is strong against Y, it needs to be errata'd"
If that were true half the cards in the game would be nerfed.
Pikeru wrote:Very good point. Problem is it doesn't apply here. Rather it should be X is strong against A,B,C,D,E,F and G as it's not 1 card vs. another, but 1 card vs. an entire series of different cards. I'm not judging whether Chick is still too strong or not, it just bothers me when I see incorrect analysis' such as this one.
Icyman2 wrote:And now chick has attack and defense reset on close. I think the problem ppl have with chick post nerf and vet pally is that they force you to think.
GonzoCarl wrote:I was responding to demongods point that pheonix chick wrecks big red. If I said that Star Dragon is too strong verse rush files with low HP and defense (dolls, mermaids, WK, etc.) that does not mean that star dragon is overpowered and needs errata.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest