Demongod wrote:1 EXP is meaningless?
Demongod wrote:Play 1000 games at 60%.
400 EXP is 1 level between 70 and 80.
ErnnLaties wrote:maybe it ain't so bad, because if you make it really easy to level up, there would be less of a distinction between casual gamers and those who already reached level 100+, and I don't think we want everyone to be level 100+, cuz it's just intimidating to go up against someone like that...
TLHM wrote:This should happen I feel, but then it'd be really silly if the winner gets less exp than the loser (low lv vs lv90 ish)
Phenoca wrote:The point is not how many games you have played. It is how much time you invested into the game.
If you take 12 LP off of a 13 LP opponent, then it takes much more time than, say, Peralisc's three-turn Scylla self-destruct.
That a 3-turn loss and a 29-turn loss equate to the same thing is wrong.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 1 guest