kawaiido wrote:CainHyde wrote:...
So you seriously think your solution is more fair than what GM choose?
I'm not saying it is. But at least I'm trying to spitball ideas and if my point is to be called stupid then I demand that those who are calling it stupid:
1. Attack the IDEA and not the PERSON GIVING THE IDEA
2. Come up with something you think is better.
Anyone who can't meet both criteria aren't worth listening too AND are just trying to start ****.
1) Idea is so obviously bad, it doesn't need to be criticized. It's impossible to reward the non-abusers enough without removing any incentive by many players to spend (due to the amount they would gain).
2) The current idea is basically agreed on as good.