methebest wrote:you say that as an excuse only because you are to retarded to do the simple task of coming up with a file, most mine take 10 minutes or less to come up with and some are quite decent.
AqvasFire2 wrote:methebest wrote:you say that as an excuse only because you are to retarded to do the simple task of coming up with a file, most mine take 10 minutes or less to come up with and some are quite decent.
A mediocre file is easy enough to throw together. I've been around long enough to know the mediocre stuff. That doesn't interest me.
And alright, Callonia, onto the foe list you go.
Icyman2 wrote:That's why playing monsters ex yuni I'm going so far 10-0, facing twice mid refess with the same ss i have in my file and the open you mentioned. Yeah, totally right. Seriously if people stop a bit to think and look at the stuff out there. I mean, you've got a level 2 critter that at least in my file does 60-75 damage to 2 units, ex yuni, and field wipe ss to break through refess. Plus if you double play tree of hate, you have engage immunity. Against falkow you pack some 40x2 ss and perhaps some leveling grims/opens. Oh guess what those leveling opens/grims make gaiessoul backfire. Jewel open is no problem either b/c i pack shades. Yes shades in monsters. If I don't use them on jewel, I'll use them after that annoying -1gowen+1lawtia open.
So why is it that the things that you claim to be nerfed to obscurity is able to take care of all of the stuff that you've argued is too op?
GonFreeces31 wrote:This is why I like icyman. He really knows how to play the game and adjusts his files to the meta scene and kicks **** with anything. More power to ya man! I love shades in monsters - nice touch!
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests