Switch lawtia's starter character back to dalos

[Peralisc9001]

Just went to test the new starters and lawtia newbies were loosing left and right because zugateroza isn't for starters and they don't know how to use it. It's not easy to use like the others and also confuses the new players into loosing games by playing it early.

Dalos is still the best pick for starters.


The change was stupid and will **** up all your lawtia beginners. Who would want that?
If you wanted nobody to start out with lawtia, then the job is done and there is no change needed, in that case keep zuga in the lawtia starter.

[Scientiafide]

To be fair, in my experience newbies tend to mess up playing all the starters. I've seen new players even play the gowen starter terribly (both the new one and the old one).

But yea I agree that the lawtia starter could use some changes. The extra zu isn't needed, and splashing the lycans and nighttime cards was a bad idea. Actually all the starters could use some changes to be honest. Supposedly they were gonna break some of the old rules, but they sill have that stupid 2 3 star character limit? What's wrong with giving beginners 3 3stars for a full playset (looking at kurina specifically)?

I do like these starters a lot better though. I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess the testing team had these stupid restrictions placed on them (you have to have only 2 3 stars, the lawtia starter needs to have night time units, etc.).

[AquasFire3]

I dont get why complaining about lawtia starter it is a really good starter.Its just they need to learn how to play it first.I mean it can be very powerful. Plus with a few fm lotto pulls you have level 3 lycans very easily. Which are actually very strong.

[Scientiafide]

I dont get why complaining about lawtia starter it is a really good starter.Its just they need to learn how to play it first.I mean it can be very powerful. Plus with a few fm lotto pulls you have level 3 lycans very easily. Which are actually very strong.

Let's be honest, the lawtia starter is probably the least likely to do well in folrart out of all them. I think it's safe to say that knowing what we know, if we had to start over with these cards and wanted to play lawtia the first cards to go would be the night time cards and the extra zu. All the other cards are quite good though.

The thing about playing with night is that you can't half-ass it with just one succubus and one night SS just for two units, that's not going to do very well. The file's taking up 8 card spaces for that (including an SS) when it could be adding something much better.

[GonFreeces31]

The lawt starter is only bad verse Refess but has great matchups verse gown and falkow.

[AquasFire3]

Well from what i played with it i have done great if play it right can keep it night time like 4 times in arrow. And was able to crush a lot of rush files.

[fargone]

Well from what i played with it i have done great if play it right can keep it night time like 4 times in arrow. And was able to crush a lot of rush files.

I hope you were playing it folrart and not scaring off the new players.


I hope everyone here did that.

[Peralisc9001]

Actually i found out some new players have set 11 while others don't and crest is look far more like a slaughter arena than folrart.

[methebest]

I dont get why complaining about lawtia starter it is a really good starter.Its just they need to learn how to play it first.I mean it can be very powerful. Plus with a few fm lotto pulls you have level 3 lycans very easily. Which are actually very strong.

it's bad, noobs need something simple and effective not some over Complicated.

also to the guy who keeps calling zug zu please stop as zug=guy in starter zu=the lawtia dragon emp.


also i did try to make a starter like mid lawtia file and it didn't end well >.> lawtia is to relient on rares to be compeditive. might give it another go later.