Peralisc9001 wrote:No.
Going by cards, RNG decrease belongs to refess while RNG increase belongs to falkow.
Pera let me update your knowledge in falkow rng control a bit because that statement of yours cannot be hold.
Rng buff on field (present also in gowen):
Ultimate wish Diva, student idol archer, mermaid shiled soldier, Foventosa, Rileria, Enchanter, Stricke sorcerer of regus(self), Nereis (self)
Rng dependent effects: Sky staff socress, Stricke wyvern, Mildoreo (soul), exiled military aide(soul)
Rng buff: Invisible edge, Flying
Rng debuff: Frozen Cage, “gigantic illusion”, disorientation (omg its permanent

), Ice storm, Vordore, Snaf, Galdirea, Undine soldier, exmerm (soul) , Femiel (soul),Sea wyvern (soul), Mermaid soldier (soul), Mermaid archer (soul), frost bow archer(soul), Dolphin rider (soul), Melodia (soul)
And of course we share now: Mermaid priestess
Rng control is present in both falkow and refess since set 1. Rng control belongs to both spheres.
I see currently the following issues with rng control:
-it is only effective against aggressive oriented cards (won’t be effective against sp generators, effect oriented units) engage is more reliable/allround
-contradicts with the aim of most decks cause at the end they want to destroy the cards on the field (The last time I saw a deck making good use of rng control was a gardiera deck disabeling the field and landing dical to substract lp without killing the units)
- while a refess deck can make use of a rng debuffed units to stall and gain time to buff up its field with its permanent selfbuff mechanisms, falkow doesn’t have these kinds of options.
- too many temporary effects, too many randomness, eg still no targeted permanent rng debuff existing as soul.