Request: Balance Team Defends Errata

Everything that doesn't go anywhere else.

Re: Request: Balance Team Defends Errata

Postby Jazzock » Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:23 pm

Wait... I thought emana can target AGI 2 units (and i'm pretty sure phoenix chick is agi 2...)...maybe it's a bug? O_o Unless ofc...you made phoenix chick under agi 2... then it shouldn't matter much lol
Self proclaimed user of weirdness, one of the few crazy people to actually use a pure sorceress file...


Image
User avatar
Jazzock
 
Posts: 1373
Joined: Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:33 pm
Location: Australia

Re: Request: Balance Team Defends Errata

Postby Icyman2 » Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:11 am

gadu wrote:I don't even know if those numbers refer to card usage, file win rate, or whatever. You can find some numbers In the Circle threads though. Icyman and Sunbun posted 20-30+ win streaks using UNDERDOG Carbuncles and this was BEFORE Set 11 and Violet. Now they are much stronker. Are those numbers relevant or not?

None of us got to 30 streak ever. 20 streak once but that was after violet came out.
Image
User avatar
Icyman2
 
Posts: 1826
Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 8:22 am

Re: Request: Balance Team Defends Errata

Postby Callonia » Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:11 am

My highest is 17, but that was with an lawtia/gowen file when bringer came out for the first time.

Wait you guys talking about carbuncles, I never played carbuncles i ain't gonna start now. NVm then.
User avatar
Callonia
 
Posts: 4790
Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 9:49 am

Re: Request: Balance Team Defends Errata

Postby gadu » Sun Mar 17, 2013 12:16 am

Icyman2 wrote:None of us got to 30 streak ever. 20 streak once but that was after violet came out.


You're right Icyman; your record was 28 wins, 2 losses before Violet and it was an Underdog file.
Abuser Punisher / Callonia
Image
User avatar
gadu
 
Posts: 2393
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:53 am

Re: Request: Balance Team Defends Errata

Postby gadu » Sun Mar 17, 2013 6:19 pm

gadu wrote:Can someone explain what was the purpose of nerfing 5* Emana so it couldn't interact with 4* Emana and then releasing a card that interacts with 4* Emana in exactly the same fashion that the 5* Emana nerf was designed to prevent?


Since the balance team is acting cowardly again, maybe Icyglare can answer this one?
Abuser Punisher / Callonia
Image
User avatar
gadu
 
Posts: 2393
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:53 am

Re: Request: Balance Team Defends Errata

Postby Shirozaki » Sun Mar 17, 2013 7:39 pm

The word is spineless, not cowardly.
Image
"Abandon all hope, ye who enter here" - Inscription above the gates of Alteil
Romdeau wrote:I don't have much else to say to you other than you live in your own world if you believe I have active enemies around Alteil besides from Demongod.
User avatar
Shirozaki
 
Posts: 1662
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2010 10:53 pm
Location: Capital of Books

Re: Request: Balance Team Defends Errata

Postby gadu » Sun Mar 17, 2013 9:29 pm

Shirozaki wrote:The word is spineless, not cowardly.


I could have said much worse, but I was showing some respect for GGG's feelings. It's now reaffirmed that her judgment was muddled from the start.
Abuser Punisher / Callonia
Image
User avatar
gadu
 
Posts: 2393
Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 1:53 am

Re: Request: Balance Team Defends Errata

Postby GOSCAR » Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:10 am

gadu wrote:
gadu wrote:Can someone explain what was the purpose of nerfing 5* Emana so it couldn't interact with 4* Emana and then releasing a card that interacts with 4* Emana in exactly the same fashion that the 5* Emana nerf was designed to prevent?


Since the balance team is acting cowardly again, maybe Icyglare can answer this one?

They needed money. End of story.
One does not play alteil the way they want. -Gon

False Slash- Rom
User avatar
GOSCAR
 
Posts: 2040
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2008 10:34 pm
Location: NJ

Re: Request: Balance Team Defends Errata

Postby fargone » Mon Mar 18, 2013 4:28 am

Shirozaki wrote:The word is spineless, not cowardly.



Careful, we don't want any unnecessary gun violence. You know how some of them are prone to reacting.
GonFreeces31 wrote:
fargone wrote:I realise this is completely off topic, but Icy deserves the limelight more than others. Some of whom dominate the forums with their endless posts.


What, I make legit points too...
User avatar
fargone
 
Posts: 2612
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:39 pm

Re: Request: Balance Team Defends Errata

Postby Icyglare » Mon Mar 18, 2013 5:11 pm

gadu wrote:Can someone explain what was the purpose of nerfing 5* Emana so it couldn't interact with 4* Emana and then releasing a card that interacts with 4* Emana in exactly the same fashion that the 5* Emana nerf was designed to prevent?


We didn't want to prevent combos with 4* Emana, just with the 5* Emana. The reason why is because 5* Emana is very powerful on her own without 4* Emana, she can even be played in nontribal files. The EX relies on 4* Emana, if she falls then you have a unit that perm debuffs your own units and this LV2 mermaid is currently requires "out-of-sphere" levels.
For a large amount of various Alteil Replays, try youtube link

<-- http://www.youtube.com/AlteilReplays -->

CEM guild brah!
User avatar
Icyglare
 
Posts: 2615
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 1:26 am

PreviousNext

Return to Alteil General Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron